← TerraTrace.
Protocol v3 · confirmatory panel · 2026-11-05

Within this panel and lens, the nearest Earth analog tracks roughness, not volcanic origin.

Three confirmatory Martian volcanic plains, two cratered highlands, seven Earth candidates, 60 km windows, supports at or above MOLA’s effective resolution. The frozen rules returned one clear answer — and it retires the last standing explanation of the analog claim the project had already withdrawn.

S · smoothness — SUPPORTED (3/3) V · volcanic specificity — NOT SUPPORTED (0/3) R · resolution robustness — SUPPORTED (no reversals · 1 destabilised · 3 membership-changed)
Scope of the confirmatory result. The S/V/R verdicts below use the core decision lens. TerraTrace ships five default lenses and an opt-in sixth, but these are alternative views of the same terrain — they are not independent scientific replications of this finding.
One caveat, stated first. v3 is pre-specified but not fully pre-registered: the decision rules and the config were fixed before any v3 data were seen and are unmodified since; the config's parameters are equally unchanged, with one post-run comment correction recorded and reconciled. The protocol document, however, was committed after the run. That is weaker than v2's commit-before-run and is not presented as equivalent.

1 · Design integrity, checked before reading any verdict

A confirmatory result is only worth the regime it was measured in. Every one of the 15 confirmatory honest cells was verified in-regime before the verdicts were read.

CheckResult
Comparability gate — honest cells leaving the honest regime0 of 15
Supports used (all ≥ the 1389 m MOLA effective-resolution floor)1500 / 2000 / 3000 m
Footprint available per unit; extent ratio65.8–66.4 km · ≤ 1.01
Confirmatory references per class3 volcanic plains · 2 highland
Reference contaminated by a ≥25 km IAU crater within 30 kmnone
Unlike v2 — where every cell fell outside the honest regime and the engine abstained everywhere — v3 compared 15 cells that are all genuinely in regime. The panel has the power the rules assume.

2 · S — the smoothness / shortlist explanation is confirmed

Rule: at least 2 of the 3 confirmatory plains references must put a smooth_control candidate in Pareto layer 1 at every honest support.

Reference1500 m2000 m3000 mOutcome
mars_arcadiaTIE {llano_estacado, nullarbor} RECOMMEND {llano_estacado}RECOMMEND {llano_estacado} holds
mars_cerberusRECOMMEND {nullarbor} RECOMMEND {nullarbor}RECOMMEND {nullarbor} holds
mars_solisRECOMMEND {llano_estacado} TIE {deccan, llano_estacado}TIE {deccan, llano_estacado} holds

3 of 3 hold (2 required) → S SUPPORTED. A smooth non-volcanic terrain — Nullarbor limestone (σ ≈ 5 m) or the Llano Estacado sedimentary plain (σ ≈ 14 m) — sits on the Pareto front for every confirmatory Martian volcanic plain at every honest support. What v2 could only infer, v3 measures.

3 · V — volcanic specificity fails, in both directions

Rule: at least 2 of 3 plains references must have some basaltic candidate Pareto-dominating every smooth control, and at least 1 of the 2 highland references must not.

ReferenceClassV outcome
mars_arcadiavolcanic plainsfails
mars_cerberusvolcanic plainsfails
mars_solisvolcanic plainsfails
mars_terra_sabaeahighlandholds
mars_terra_sirenumhighlandholds

0 of 3 plains hold V — and V holds for every highland reference, so the rule's second condition fails as well. V NOT SUPPORTED. A basaltic lava plain is not a better analog for a Martian volcanic plain than a smooth limestone or sedimentary plain is.

4 · The mechanism, visible in the cells

Smooth → smooth

Arcadia (σ 7 m) and Cerberus (σ 5 m) are matched by the two smoothest Earth candidates: Nullarbor (σ 5 m, limestone) and Llano Estacado (σ 14 m, sedimentary).

Rough → rough

Terra Sabaea (σ 148 m) and Terra Sirenum (σ 256 m) are matched by Harrat Khaybar (σ 102 m) — a basaltic field. The basalts win where the terrain is rough, not where it is volcanic.

And the one smooth basalt behaves as a smooth candidate: Deccan Traps (σ 32 m, flood basalt) enters layer 1 for Solis Planum — the roughest of the three plains references — precisely when the window is large enough to average its relief. It competes because it is comparatively smooth, not because it is volcanic. Within this panel and lens, origin does no work that roughness does not already do.

nullarbor
σ 5 m
llano_estacado
σ 14 m
deccan_traps
σ 32 m
snake_river_plain
σ 95 m
harrat_khaybar
σ 102 m
odadahraun
σ 182 m
nevada_basin
σ 562 m
smooth control · non-volcanicbasaltic (pre-run label)otherlog scale

The two references that carry S — Arcadia (σ 7 m) and Cerberus (σ 5 m) — sit at the smooth end of this ladder, exactly where the two non-volcanic controls sit. The basalts cluster higher, and they win only where the target is rough.

5 · R — resolution robustness holds

All 15 confirmatory honest cells were classified raw versus resolution-matched (every unit low-passed to the same 1389 m effective resolution).

unchangedstabiliseddestabilisedreversedmembership changederror
11010 30

No reversal → R SUPPORTED. This is where the v2 lesson paid off: v2's over-broad rule (“any change”) fired on a mere stabilisation. v3's classifier separates the cases, so mars_solis @1500 m loosening from RECOMMEND to TIE is recorded as destabilised, not as a reversal. Re-running S and V on the matched panel gives the same verdicts (differs: false).

6 · The panel

Seven Earth candidates at 60 km, with the measured roughness that turns out to do the work. Classes were assigned from the literature before the run.

CandidateClass60 km σ (m)Role
nullarborsmooth control5limestone plain — non-volcanic
llano_estacadosmooth control14sedimentary high plain — non-volcanic
deccan_trapsbasaltic32flood basalt
snake_river_plainbasaltic95basaltic plain (contains Craters of the Moon)
harrat_khaybarbasaltic102basaltic volcanic field
odadahraunbasaltic182basaltic lava plain, Iceland
nevada_basinother562basin-and-range near-miss

7 · Reported, never used as evidence

8 · What this does — and does not — say

Does say

With MOLA + Copernicus GLO-30, real 60 km windows, honest supports and matched footprints, the Earth terrain that best matches a Martian volcanic plain is a smooth one — and at least as likely to be non-volcanic. The withdrawn Craters-of-the-Moon preference is explained by smoothness, and the explanation is now tested rather than asserted.

Does not say

That no Earth terrain resembles a Martian plain — the morphometric similarity is real and measured. That basalts are irrelevant to Mars analog work — they matter where the target is rough. Or anything about traversability, geologic equivalence, site access, or mission readiness.

9 · Limits, unchanged and load-bearing

Falsifier for the next iteration: a pre-registered panel in which a smooth specifically volcanic terrain beats the smooth non-volcanic controls for Martian volcanic plains but not for highlands. Deccan Traps is the closest case here and it does not do that.

10 · Reproduce it — no API key, no account

# the Earth candidates come from the public ESA Copernicus GLO-30 COG mosaic on AWS
python scripts/fetch_earth_candidates.py --config config/matched_footprint_v3.yml --source cog
python scripts/run_matched_benchmark.py --config config/matched_footprint_v3.yml --out artifacts/mf_panel_v3

The COG path is verified bit-identical to the OpenTopography COP30 product (maximum absolute difference 0.0 m). The Mars side is the single global MOLA 463 m GeoTIFF. Both need rasterio.